zeeManYT
20 days ago
Put simply, I entirely agree with TaiuReinhart's post on this feed. BoomStickB's discretion to give me a month long mute for "Respect All Players" is very clearly wrong and an abuse of said discretion. Howver, Diaphortetic, as disheartening as it is, reinforced this abuse by denying my appeal.
You wanna know what I said that got me muted for so long? : "BoomStickB can't speak another language, common BoomStick L"
Is this not common speech? Is this not banter? How is it that this rises to a level of disrespect warranting a mute? I wasn't even warned for goodness sake! And here's the kicker! I have a screenshot of BoomStickB going even further than I by admitting that he can't even speak ENGLISH. Should not BoomStickB be muted for disrespect towards a player? Or is he an exception to the rule due to his staff status? The notion "Well it was directed towards himself" may be used, but it is false in its application. Would I not then be muted for self deprecating myself in chat to an extent that it seemed as if I was mentally unhealthy and needed a therapist? Or would that be allowed since everything I say would be directed towards myself? Would I not be told to drop the topic? Would I not be warned to stop? Then why is it that in the mute I received, I was not warned previously? and why is it that BoomStickB is not held to the same standard as myself? Should not staff be held to an even higher standard than the regular player base? Plus, what kind of impersonal copy paste appeal responses are you giving out Diaphoretic? I mean my man, I was MUTED, yet it said "We hope to see you after your ban has been fulfilled". Clearly you are not taking appeal forms seriously enough. I'm sure the workload from them is massive, however, rather than simply deny them on whims with the same copy paste shenanigans, why not give genuine, and personal responses while maintaining the professional aspect? Is it true that you even looked at the facts of my case in specific? If you did, then what possible reasoning led you to believe that the ruling by BoomStickB was at all fair or just? What reasoning led you to believe that no reduction of the punishment's duration was fair? How many cases have there been similar to mine which have been appealed on whims or not approved on whims? Why are you setting a standard of next to no speech for the player base by denying my appeal? No tone or hint of disrespect or contention can be held at all within our speech? If so, why is not half of the server muted for a month by now? Why is it that I am held personally to a higher standard of not just a majority of players, but also STAFF! As I mentioned, I have a screenshot of BOOMSTICKB HIMSELF admitting he can't even speak ENGLISH. Let alone any other languages like my joke implied that got me muted for a whole month alongside a denied appeal. Would I be muted for saying "You smell!" To someone? What if moments after I were to follow it up with "nice..." as in to say they smell nice, the joke being the misleading nature of the phrase. Granted, it is not as though I can actually smell them, so what would it matter anyway? Because that is about the same amount of "disrespect" in my banter towards BoomStickB. It's a joke, truly. These rules are a joke, and the staff make it even funnier by being jokes themselves. Because that way, it's a kangaroo court where staff are always right! Why would a random player's interpretation of the rules matter after all? Why would you set a common standard? Why would you not trust the discretion of your fellow comrade in staff over a genuine player who plays daily and sinks hours of their time into the server? TaiuReinhart is right in saying it is a dictatorship. See, a king sets laws that apply to even himself, that is what makes a king noble and good. The dictator however, sets laws that apply disproportionately to whomever he wishes on mere whims. This is why democracy became common practice, by decentralizing the power it is easier to apply the law fairly and justly to all, whether than be left in the hands of an unjust dictator or tyrant. And so although I agree and understand the "discretion" clause, standards nonetheless should be set as to allow fairness to all players. That way rather than mere whims of the day, some professional scrutiny can be applied rather than disproportionately handing out punishments from ambitiously ambiguous rules.
Thanks for your time in reading this, to whomever you may be reader. I honestly doubt Diaphoretic himself would go so far as to read this essay and give a personal response to it due to his lack in doing such in even just appeals. As TaiuReinhart said, thanks for going above and beyond for me! -_-